> I also hope that [..] the company won't feel a need to diverge into multiple half-baked products.
You bet. Since 1998, we have a small set of well-maintained software products. ShareMouse is not a quick shot. We are here for the long run.
Why?
ssh othermachine 'pbpaste' | pbcopy
Why not just have a proper shared clipboard plus keyboard/mouse sharing in a multi-computer, multi-monitor setup?
Because if you don't need keyboard/mouse sharing that's just bloat running on your machine, because you become dependent on yet another utility that may be discontinued or receive a crappy update at any time, because it's less flexible (can I share only on demand?), less portable and it costs $50 that would be better spent on blackjack and hookers (or whatever you do for relaxing).
Yes, you can.
> less portable
There is a portable option
> and it costs $50 that would be better spent on blackjack
Oh, we should always listen to such kind of advisers.
I mean OS portable. I use Windows and Linux, you don't support that.
Oh, we should always listen to such kind of advisers.
I don't mean as an investment, I mean as entertainment. The "blackjack and hookers" is a reference to Futurama: http://youtu.be/z5tZMDBXTRQ
By the way, I'm not saying my solution is better than your application as a whole, far from it. I'm talking about the case where you only need clipboard sharing, which I know is only one of the features of your application.
ssh othermachine x2x -to :0 -east
Spending $50 saves me a lot of time and frustration. Also, it is much cheaper than writing the software myself (which I was seriously considering). I'm more than happy to pay that.
I also hope that because the software is well priced, the company won't feel a need to diverge into multiple half-baked products. I've seen that happen to Ironic Software (Yep, and afterwards Leap, Deep, Fresh), I'm seeing it happen to IcyBlaze (iDocument, and then Sparkbox). I'd much rather see a company develop ONE well-supported and polished app than diverge into multiple bug-ridden ones.