News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/36326587. Parent comment

Re: by jasonwcfan on Thursday June 15, 2023 @01:39PM (#36344015)
I had no idea what "unifying" meant at first. The best guess I can make is something that lets humans interact with AI and computer systems, which is super vague.

Maybe I'm just to used to all the marketing speak out there where "unifying" has been co-opted to mean basically nothing. e.g. "We unify technology with human potential!"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by bbor on Thursday June 15, 2023 @01:46PM (#36344104)
Good points. Perhaps “cooperate” is clearer? Or “Connecting”?

Tho at a certain point we’ve gotta reclaim the fun academic terms from the MBAs!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by TechBro8615 on Thursday June 15, 2023 @07:44PM (#36348667)
I think what's missing from the title is "actor framework" - omitting it is kinda burying the lede, since the main idea seems to be fitting AI and human workflow orchestration into an actor framework, which is a well known paradigm with a name that immediately evokes the intent of the library.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by 0perand on Thursday June 15, 2023 @08:39PM (#36349257)
thank you for this feedback! I was considering something like that. I'm going to make some updates for clarity and mentioning the actor model approach more prominently will definitely be part of it.
[ Parent | on HN ]