Part of environmentalism is knowing when not to buy new. What we should do is a cash-for-clunkers exclusively for trucks and SUVs that get replaced with electric sedans. They’re lower fuel efficiency, and way more dangerous.
I hope that I'll be able to buy used ICE cars for the remainder of my life, at least.
I've soured on all modern cars, and especially electric cars, because of their data connections. That's a dealbreaker for me.
With electric, if you set up a solar panel and battery system you have a greater ability to stay private by detaching from the grid and external dependencies(at least until you need to buy a part to fix/maintain your car).
Right now is probably the golden era because its before a lot of the OEM have gotten their act together on making a fully locked down system like Tesla but it still is the EV era so you benefit from the example above.
Yes, I agree. But it's not a thing that would impact my life enough to bother hacking to accomplish it. I can just buy old ICE cars and be fine.
I only have a limited amount of time in each day, and I have to prioritize things.
Well then you have a limit to how much you actually care about your privacy. So really whats the ultimate point then?
Gasoline, however, may become harder to come by. You may have to plan your long-distance trips around the remaining gas stations. I imagine that by then there will be apps to help you plan that trip.
https://cleantechnica.com/2023/06/04/tesla-model-3-lifecycle...
I don't entirely buy the author's depreciation argument, since that assumes you're trading in your car every 5 years as opposed to driving it for 15-20+ years until it ready to literally fall apart.
But even still, when you consider significantly reduced maintenance and fuel costs, it's not that far off.
I don't drive enough to make up a difference of $5000+ a year in gas and maintenance.
For a lot of people that calculation is true, but there's also going to be people like me where the TCO statement is hilariously untrue.
Wow, that just sucks, even more so if you actually shopped around.
I was quoted $2-300/month for my BMW i4, switched insurance companies and got it back down to $100/month.
Probably not but the comment doesn't seem to engage with their point. Let's say the government had an incentive program for dealers to collect money for buying back the consumer's current vehicle at an increased price but only if the consumer chooses to purchase an electric vehicle. Would it have been a closer decision, even if marginal (even if you still choose the non-EV option)? Even if you don't, someone else will choose the EV option because it's ultimately cheaper.
Looking past my anecdotal experience, there are many other contributing factors to why people don’t want an EV. Yes, high purchase price is a big driver, but things like a lack of charging infrastructure, battery technology not being ready yet (big agree from me on this one), and people just straight up preferring an ICE are not far behind.
To generalize and say that anyone who isn’t buying an EV is doing so because they can’t afford one is factually wrong.
Source: https://epic.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/EPIC-En...
If you want everyone to drive an electric car, then you need to make it the value buy when it comes time to replace their current car.
People are keep cars longer, might be time for another cash for clunkers program with an extra incentive to replace it with a electric. But until interest rate go down and car price level off, people are not rushing to get cars.