They do but I'm not the one trying to justify any of these policies hinting at a conspiracy.

> In other words, you couldn't defend your first response to my comment, so now you've got to pull the conspiracy card even though none of what I said necessarily implies conspiracy or points to anyone in particular.

You asked why would anabolic steroids, specifically, would be illegal if not because they make people look more masculine, muscular, and attractive according to you. Like that would be the only reason: keeping people from looking more masculine, muscular, and sexier.

Anyway, I see your original comments have been deleted so that’s kinda moot and I have no interest in arguing about this further with you.

I removed my comment because I felt it was too snarky and likewise didn't want to get into a long argument with you.

If that's how you interpreted my comment, then I wish it was made clearer, because I did not mean to imply "only" anything.