News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I am Steve Huffman, the new CEO of Reddit. AMA. (2015) by mlyle on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @09:43PM (#36335402)
Reddit was weakly profitable but now has done a ton of hiring in hopes of building a huge business and chasing the IPO money train.

They have 2000 employees now. They had fewer than 200 in 2015.

Re:I am Steve Huffman, the new CEO of Reddit. AMA. (2015) by chubot on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @10:08PM (#36335555)
That's kind of what I suspected ... it seems like a self-inflicted problem, a consequence of the VC model and "enshittification"

This makes Wikipedia seem prescient. It also has basically all user-contributed content, and user moderation

You can point out a lot of its flaws, for sure, but at the end of the day, the product actually works

Reddit for me is barely functional, I still used old.reddit.com

Of course that was the intention all along -- to drive users to mobile -- which is just sad. Destroying value on purpose

Re:I am Steve Huffman, the new CEO of Reddit. AMA. (2015) by KnobbleMcKnees on Thursday June 15, 2023 @12:04AM (#36336248)
The whole thing can be summed up as such: Reddit has continued to expand its business and increase costs while failing to innovate in any meaningful way.

In a bubble, the business is ultimately a failure and it deserves to die. It's just sad given the quality of the content is so high in contrast to the platform and the lack of an outstanding of alternative for people to congregate around, as Reddit once was for digg users.

Re:I am Steve Huffman, the new CEO of Reddit. AMA. (2015) by opportune on Thursday June 15, 2023 @12:10AM (#36336291)
Wikipedia enshittified too, to a lesser extent, but still they have made their begging more and more aggressive over time.
Re:I am Steve Huffman, the new CEO of Reddit. AMA. (2015) by chubot on Friday June 16, 2023 @12:16PM (#36359145)
I would say Wikipedia has been overly aggressive in their fundraising

But it hasn't enshittified

I would be really happy if Reddit ended up like Wikipedia. You can argue that Wikipedia could make better use of their funds (you can always argue that), but look at what Reddit did with their funds

They basically dug a big hole and are ruining the product to get out of it. I'd rather Wikipedia have extra cash than be in the hole, and desperate