Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it

Posted by jspencer508 on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @01:34PM
from the defensenews.com dept.

( 2 comments | 3 points | on HN )

Re:Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it by zgluck on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @01:42PM (#36329567)

Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it by jprd on Wednesday June 14, 2023 @01:55PM (#36329803)

Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title.

Also. F. That.

War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it.

"I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that."

[ Parent | on HN ]