Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by swombat on Thursday November 13, 2008 @12:24PM
(#363260)
As surprising as that may sound, 99% of developers out there are not buying new high-end servers for data crunching, no.
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by crabapple on Thursday November 13, 2008 @12:43PM
(#363293)
what is in the cpus of those machines will be in the cpus of all machines. jesus, how much more legit can you get than intel telling you this is coming?
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by d0mine on Thursday November 13, 2008 @02:31PM
(#363477)
Intel may try to sell many-core but who wants to buy it?
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by crabapple on Thursday November 13, 2008 @04:08PM
(#363599)
you. you aren't going to be given the choice, these are coming to a laptop near you...like on your lap
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by axod on Thursday November 13, 2008 @05:49PM
(#363700)
So you're saying that no one will ever sell lower cost single core laptops any more? hrmmm I'm skeptical.
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by axod on Thursday November 13, 2008 @02:48PM
(#363499)
Um... you consider a chip maker, telling you that you need to buy new chips "legit"?
Re:"Sequential programming is dead. So stop teaching it"
by orib on Thursday November 13, 2008 @05:39PM
(#363691)
No, but I consider a chip maker telling me what kind of chips they're going to be making legit. Especially when all the other chip makers are saying the same thing (All the other chip makers: AMD, Freescale, Intel, Sun, Marvell, and others)
then you clearly aren't buying new high-end servers for data crunching either, because these are already multicore