News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rewriting the Ruby Parser. Parent comment

Re:Rewriting the Ruby Parser by Rauchg on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @03:13PM (#36315381)
Except my preference for SSR as the default dates as far back as 2014 and is rooted in the laws of physics[1] Downloading an empty shell, downloading code to render a bunch of spinners, to then incur in a bunch of waterfalls of data and more code to the server is not gonna make it.

[1] https://rauchg.com/2014/7-principles-of-rich-web-application...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rewriting the Ruby Parser by pcthrowaway on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @04:18PM (#36316401)
I mean those are fair points, though respectfully I think there are cases for SPAs where SSR won't do. But that's not what we're talking about.

Referring to SPAs as a "zero-interest-rate phenomenon" implies that SSG/SSR models are more efficient in terms of financial cost of deployment. I don't agree this is necessarily the case, and I think SPAs can be developed and deployed sanely and cheaply also.

Vercel is doing some amazing things, but it's also innovating in ways that occasionally lead to "lock-in", in the sense that moving away from Vercel would involve a lot of friction. So I think it's fair to point out that you have a financial interest in convincing people to adopt delivery models that your business streamlines.

[ Parent | on HN ]