US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by LatteLazy on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @10:35AM (#36310800)

I am just asking what the point is? Why bother with all the paperwork banning a merger that is not going to happen? The US (or UK or anyone else) has every RIGHT to book on it. But why spend time and energy exercising that right if it makes no difference and another country already vetoed it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by frumper on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @10:39AM (#36310885)

Some other outlets reported that Microsoft and Activision were talking about completing the deal despite the UK regulator. The EU already gave it approval to happen, and the US hadn't specifically blocked it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/12/technology/ftc-sue-micros...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by LatteLazy on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @10:50AM (#36311063)

That's fine if both companies (or the one resulting company) never wants to do business in the UK again...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by frumper on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @11:16AM (#36311492)

Or they think the UK citizens won't throw the regulators and their bosses out of a job. I doubt many citizens in the UK feel strongly enough about the merger to want access to neither if they merge. People don't particularly like when you take their toys away.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by worrycue on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:13PM (#36313393)

If all that ends up being blocked are consoles and games, there are plenty of substitutes - in some cases near perfect substitutes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by frumper on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:38PM (#36313739)

It's a weird argument to block Microsoft and Activision merging in the name of competition and be ok with leaving less competition in it's wake.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by worrycue on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:06PM (#36314172)

MS could always just not merge with Activision.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @01:24PM (#36313529)

> fine if both companies (or the one resulting company) never wants to do business in the UK again

There are loads of solutions to this problem, the most obvious one being pulling Activision titles out of the U.K. or spinning off independent distribution rights to that market.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by schnitzelstoat on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @10:38AM (#36310859)

They could proceed but cease operations in the UK, I'm not sure exactly what that would look like. I guess using a local distributor like they did with NetEase in China?

It would be pretty crazy, but it's not impossible. They aren't going to pull out of the USA though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by topkai22 on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @11:19AM (#36311529)

The UK blocking the merger doesn’t necessarily stop it. It could be overturned on appeal or the deal could be modified to suit the UK’s concerns.

It’s also theoretically possible that the deal goes through despite the CMA not approving it. I’m not a lawyer and I don’t know if that looks like Microsoft no longer selling games and gaming in the UK (possible) or no longer doing business in the UK entirely (not likely).

Besides, the US filed suit back in 2022.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by 908B64B197 on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @02:06PM (#36314175)

> or the deal could be modified to suit the UK’s concerns.

The argument given by the UK's bureaucrats had something to do with cloud gaming. I guess they could make Activision's tittles available on competing cloud gaming platforms in the UK.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US moves to block Microsoft's Activision takeover by LikesPwsh on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @04:47PM (#36317001)

It saves MS from attempting to reverse the decision in British courts, so probably net saving of human time and effort all things considered.

[ Parent | on HN ]