Re:JPEG XL against AVIF tested on ImageEngine
by tambourine_man on Monday June 12, 2023 @05:52AM
(#36290851)
Learn about noise and dithering. You can have seamless blue skies with 8 bits that way.
It’s more a fault of the camera applying excessive noise reduction than the format.
Besides, if we’re worried about file sizes, 16 bit files are humongous.
Re:JPEG XL against AVIF tested on ImageEngine
by JyrkiAlakuijala on Monday June 12, 2023 @06:00AM
(#36290932)
jpegli is an even better option -- it adds 10+ bits in old jpeg format in its '8-bit mode'
Re:JPEG XL against AVIF tested on ImageEngine
by AuryGlenz on Monday June 12, 2023 @10:15AM
(#36293790)
I know about adding noise, but to call that a solution is silly. You’re purposely degrading the image to get around the technical limitations of a 30 year old format.
I disagree about the noise reduction part too. Modern (larger, not sure about cell phone) sensors basically have basically no noise at ISO 64-100 or so. It’s just an inherent limitation of only having 255 steps of brightness.
Re:JPEG XL against AVIF tested on ImageEngine
by tambourine_man on Tuesday June 13, 2023 @03:13AM
(#36306673)
Dithering is a feature. It’s used all the time in audio and image. And a little bit of noise is a good thing. Two of my favorite sources on the subject:
https://youtu.be/cIQ9IXSUzuM?t=700
https://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photogr...
The fact I need to worry about going back to re-edit them and losing quality is silly.
So no, not good enough.