News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Execs on Facebook (2011) by badsectoracula on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:03PM (#36286197)
> The objection could very well be for security reasons.

It could also be for control over users but claiming "security reasons" whenever anyone asks since that has become a "think of the children" topic in tech.

Re:Apple Execs on Facebook (2011) by DrBenCarson on Sunday June 11, 2023 @06:21PM (#36286324)
Sure I don’t disagree. My point was that the quote isn’t “proof.”
Re:Apple Execs on Facebook (2011) by ryandrake on Sunday June 11, 2023 @10:16PM (#36287711)
The thing I took away from this exchange was the total lack of discussion about what’s in the end user’s best interest. What’s best for the user’s experience? It’s all “We want this” and “Facebook wants that” and the end user is just a bystander. Nobody cares what we think or want.

For all these companies’ marketing-talk about how they care so much about the end user experience, the executives don’t seem all that interested.

Re:Apple Execs on Facebook (2011) by doctor_eval on Monday June 12, 2023 @02:34AM (#36289213)
Do you not think that this would already have been discussed when the policy under discussion was first developed? The rationale for the policy - whatever it is - would have been determined well before this problem arose. There would be no need for these people, who would have been central to those policies, to rehash their reasons in these emails. They already know all the arguments.