Ad hominem attacks mean you can't seem to refute what I'm saying.

Why aren't we talking about https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protes... or Uyghurs ...

No, we must "ask questions" about shit we'll never be able to figure out because we're fighting over the right to flood the net with stuff that doesn't help.

That wasn't an ad hominem attack. You're not even arguing a point.

Your so-called argument is basically "No U". Obvious CCP troll.

This here is a good example of an ad hominem attack, you're point is that I am not allowed to make my argument for reasons that are not addressing my argument.

Please read the real provable reasons to not trust china instead of endless questions about what ifs, which is my point, that we can be against china for real reasons and not make believe ones like that we have any proof of a lab leak. Hell maybe it happened, but it doesn't help to keep digging if it can't ever be proven.

No it is not an ad hominem attack to say that your argument is childish and stupid. You're not even having a debate. You're just spamming the forum with drivel.

I am trying to say that either it leaked or it didn't, but that we'll never know, but that it doesn't matter anyway.

We will know, eventually, hopefully. I think it really matters. To better prevent future pandemics and to establish frameworks for restitution. And it definitely matters for future economic reparations.

If negligence is the cause of a multi-million death, multi-trillion dollar response it needs to be corrected to prevent future similar errors.

The linked article is from 2004. It clearly says nothing re: point 2.

So what? You missed the point or are pretending to ignore it. Another CCP troll.