News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cogs bad. Parent comment

Re:Cogs bad by hythloday on Thursday February 23, 2012 @02:48PM (#3626409)
You're quite right, but paying the costs of synchronization at a hardware/C level rather than at a Java one defrays the cost of going out of process.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cogs bad by groby_b on Monday February 27, 2012 @01:41PM (#3640047)
Java synchronization is _that_ bad? (Not trolling - I just spend most of my days in C/C++). Any good performance studies you could point me to?
[ Parent | on HN ]