Re:I bought the only physical encyclopedia still in print, a...
by manifoldgeo on Friday June 09, 2023 @04:44PM
(#36263930)
My college professors said that an encyclopedia article can't be cited because it's a tertiary source of information. That's considered too far abstracted from the original source of the info to be used as a citation. Primary sources are original documents like the U.S. Constitution; secondary sources are books about the U.S. Constitution that offer some kind of analysis by professionals; tertiary sources are aggregate articles citing multiple analyses, aggregating them together like a Reader's Digest but not contributing further to the discussion like a viewpoint or stance or new info.
All of the above is explained in this article[1] (I just lazily searched for one).
Re:I bought the only physical encyclopedia still in print, a...
by schoen on Friday June 09, 2023 @06:51PM
(#36265374)
Conversely, Wikipedia policies ask article editors to use only secondary and tertiary sources when writing the encyclopedia (related to the "no original research" policy).
All of the above is explained in this article[1] (I just lazily searched for one).
Sources: 1: https://crk.umn.edu/library/primary-secondary-and-tertiary-s...