> The context you think I didn't include is the thing that spez is explicitly saying he didn't understand correctly?

sorry, this doesn't make sense to me.

I quoted spez apologizing for misunderstanding something. You're saying I left that something out as context. Considering spez acknowledged his misunderstanding and apologized, it seems a bit ridiculous to expect the something he apologized for to "override" his apology, doesn't it?

> Considering spez acknowledged his misunderstanding and apologized, it seems a bit ridiculous

I answered this already, it could be sugarcoating. Sorry, this discussion is low quality to my taste and I have no interest in continuing. Good bye.