Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by aydyn on Thursday June 08, 2023 @08:32PM
(#36251433)
There's no other possibility except a technical solution. Expecting humans to change their behavior collectively, across the globe, is magical thinking.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by suoduandao2 on Thursday June 08, 2023 @08:40PM
(#36251511)
And yet the birth rate keeps declining. Maybe we're collectively smarter than we fear.
Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by merouan on Thursday June 08, 2023 @09:20PM
(#36251911)
Here’s the thing: actually, we need the behavior of a _very small_ number of humans to change: the rich. Not only is their personal CO2 consumption the majority of personal CO2 consumption, but the capital they control drives the behavior and policy of everything else. This is a far easier problem to solve. I’ll leave the solution to your imagination.
Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by DoreenMichele on Thursday June 08, 2023 @09:23PM
(#36251928)
Sadly, many of them would rather plan to ruin the world and then flee to a (cough) "safehouse" (cough) in New Zealand than in any way get a clue.
Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by ben_w on Friday June 09, 2023 @06:46AM
(#36255925)
Kinda, but most people on this website are in the global top 1%, and 1% is both a small percentage and still 80 million people.
Re:Could seaweed be the 'fastest and least expensive' tool t...
by aydyn on Saturday June 17, 2023 @01:03AM
(#36367460)
That's actually completely and entirely untrue. The largest delta of CO2 in the coming years will be coming from developing countries as they rise up to modern standards.
But when you say:
> This is a far easier problem to solve. I’ll leave the solution to your imagination.
It pretty clear you're not really arguing in good faith. Dog whistle is pretty loud.