And was for one specific year.
So in addition to "being false" and "you were so busy being angry you didn't bother to read", it's not even a reasonable claim to be exponential.
Normally I wouldn't mind rolling with that as a hope for what might come, but you're being everything you're accusing everyone else here of being.
> That is about one country's policy
Policy? That actually makes it worse, because it implies Japan will not meet more than 1% of its demand that way.
> Like I said, this is a major current event and guys like you are demanding proof of a massive global event that everyone should be aware of.
Which in total is next to nothing: 1% over 15 years, if everyone matches Japan's proposal.
And everyone else was telling you to actually dig up a link.
Getting the link from you was like blood from a stone.
And YOY means year-over-year, so if it's 50% over last year, then it's 50% YOY. You can interpretate that as exponential growth unless you are expecting growth to stall.
I don't see anywhere in that article that suggests this is just 1% of Japan's energy need. It should be a very significant portion.
Again, this is a major current event. You expect people to be aware of it, or can do the most basic of googling. A lot of people here apparently either are profoundly ignorant or totally in denial that it is happening.
This is from your previous post:
> In 2022, over $240 billion was invested in more than 680 global hydrogen projects, marking a 50 per cent increase in investments compared to the previous year.
Hence 50% YOY growth.
And if you understand exponential growth, you'd know that this is extremely fast and it can quickly catch up to whatever target you're dreaming of.
That is about one country's policy. And it was literally announced days ago, meaning that this is a regular occurrence globally. You are intentionally missing the point I was making. Like I said, this is a major current event and guys like you are demanding proof of a massive global event that everyone should be aware of.