News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations by snapcaster on Thursday June 08, 2023 @01:41PM (#36245726)
It's not a hyperbole lmao. Now you get to be the one who is pedantically corrected for no reason
Re:Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations by dllthomas on Thursday June 08, 2023 @02:07PM (#36246110)
I wasn't correcting you. I was agreeing with you. I was correcting the dictionaries that have (IMO) got it wrong. Now, in this paragraph, I am correcting you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

> It's not a hyperbole lmao.

I disagree, obviously, but perhaps an explanation is in order so that we can be sure we're talking about the same thing (and give you something more specific to argue against if you still disagree).

The difference between "X is Y" and "X is literally Y", when both expressions are figurative, is that the latter is meant to be strengthened by overstating the degree to which X is in fact Y. I contend that this is a hyperbolic use of "literally".

Re:Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations by SanderNL on Thursday June 08, 2023 @04:29PM (#36248457)
I’m loving this.
Re:Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations by dllthomas on Thursday June 08, 2023 @06:03PM (#36249847)
Happy to entertain! Obviously some people are annoyed by the whole thing but I find it interesting picking apart what's going on with our words.