That’s absolutely false — sideloading has nothing to do with security checks, especially not sandboxing.

A sane system should not be compromised no matter where the executable is from.

> A sane system should not be compromised no matter where the executable is from.

So, you're saying a sane system should not run arbitrary code I tell it to run? (If not, please explain how your hypothetical magic OS resists compromise without limiting instructions it would execute)

You are running code on your CPU in ring 0 all the time? No. The same way a sandbox gives a whitelist approach to security — this app by default should have no filesystem access. It does want to open a file — ask the user whether it should be able to or not.

Security is upheld, user control is given, everyone is happy.

Well if we are talking sandboxing, Windows has it and this malware specifically has sandbox escape functionality for that purpose.

What kind of sandbox does Windows have? All I could find was about a pro/enterprise feature but even that has to be explicitly started and I doubt minecraft users used that.

Not having admin rights is almost uselessly crude as a “sandbox”.

There is the one called "windows sandbox" but it's not persistent making it useless.

More recently, I've been following https://github.com/microsoft/win32-app-isolation which seems incredibly interesting! If they can pull it off, we will have mobile-os like security on windows, finally, after all these years.

It has been my #1 feature request for windows for so long... I almost can't believe it's actually happening.

Idk https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36238459