News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by ac29 on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @09:20PM (#36235965)
The article title is incorrect, this restraining order has been requested by the SEC, not granted yet.

Its a bit confusing because the submitted order is a proposal of how a order could be given by a judge, but is still full of important blank information like the name of the judge, the date, etc.

Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by phire on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @09:30PM (#36236039)
Title appears to be correct:

"Later on Tuesday, a filing from the United States District Court for the District Of Columbia showed that the court had agreed to grant the SEC’s demands."

Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by ac29 on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @09:44PM (#36236123)
Nope, look at the filing: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.256...

Its a proposed order.

for those who dont want to click through, its full of stuff like this:

"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendants show cause, if any, before the Honorable __________ of this Court, at __ o’clock _.m., on the __ day of ____, 2023, in Courtroom _____, United States Courthouse"

Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by tedunangst on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @10:00PM (#36236221)
First time court tourists are often surprised that you can write your own order for the judge to sign, and it sure sounds official, but it's missing the magic signature that makes it go.
Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by gpm on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @10:28PM (#36236434)
I think the author of the article misunderstood.

In the article the words "a filing" link to attachment 1 to docket entry 4, titled "Text of Proposed Order"

Further the docket indicates that sometime today (Wednesday) the court scheduled a hearing on the 13th to consider this motion (docket entry 4).

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67474542/securities-and...

As tedunangst says below, this is common and doesn't mean the judge agreed with you.

It just makes it procedurally easy for the judge to agree with you. The judge might not sign it at all. Might edit it and then sign it. Might write their own version that says something else. Etc.

Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by phire on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @11:28PM (#36236800)
Yeah, looks like you are correct.

I only checked that the title matched the contents of the article, not that the article was correctly researched.

Re:SEC granted emergency restraining order to freeze, repatr... by donedeals on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @10:39PM (#36236488)
@dang - title should be changed.