Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by mattadams on Wednesday February 22, 2012 @07:15PM
(#3623192)
Yeah, that is probably never going to happen or if it does it's so far out that it's not worth speculating on.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by 3pt14159 on Wednesday February 22, 2012 @07:46PM
(#3623279)
Think about the amount of data the 70 people at Dropbox move. A couple hundred years ago that would have taken every single literate person.
Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by jey on Wednesday February 22, 2012 @08:41PM
(#3623415)
How do you justify that very strong assertion? What's your definition of "far out"?
The past 100 years are a great example of how a lot of change can happen in a short amount of time.
Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by Qworg on Thursday February 23, 2012 @01:21AM
(#3624025)
There already are unmanned oil platforms. As communications and remote systems get better, I expect to see even more automation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normally_unmanned_installation
http://www.shell.com/home/content/innovation/meeting_demand/...
Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by mattadams on Thursday February 23, 2012 @01:35AM
(#3624044)
I'm aware that there are unmanned stations -- not only oil platforms but regular leases. I live in oil & natural gas country (Northern Alberta). What you don't see are the thousands and thousands of guys running around keeping it all ticking.
There are some things that you can automate -- but a lot of things in the oil & gas industry cannot be automated. Specifically, the leg work required to get things started & keep them maintained. Automating those sorts of things requires a pretty advanced AI and I don't see that coming around the corner anytime soon.
Re:Paul Graham: Why Y Combinator Replaces The Traditional Co...
by rdl on Thursday February 23, 2012 @05:05AM
(#3624413)
You can make things simpler for dumber AIs (or dumber workers) by designing field-replaceable-units with that in mind. It is going to cost more/be less efficient, so as long as a human costs $300k/yr or less, no need, but when that isn't the case, you see "forklift upgrades", etc.