Is AI killing the stock photo industry? A data perspective

Re:Is AI killing the stock photo industry? A data perspective by Trapais on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @10:53AM (#36227541)

That's a very fancy way with lots of fancy words to say "I have no idea how NN work, but if I sound smart maybe ppl will not figure out how stupid I sound". Well, you sound stupid and nothing what you said makes sense.

Delineate? Diffusion models can't be further away for delineating. They literally work by throwing random shit at the wall.

Input set? There is no input set once training is complete.

Human creativity? In stock photo industry? What next? "How I write while loop instead of for loop and I have achieved the nirvana?"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is AI killing the stock photo industry? A data perspective by wilimitis on Thursday June 08, 2023 @12:12AM (#36237097)

Incorrect - I'm clearly using delineate to mean providing the exact set of computational instructions which produce the output (image), which by the definition of "computable" must be true.

You seem emotional, "you sound stupid and nothing what you said makes sense", I wonder, why are you so triggered by a challenging idea?

The very point of computation is to evaluate clear, distinct, mathematical expressions (like reading a list of algorithmic steps to produce an NN).

Hmmm. Did I threaten your religious belief in the power of AI? :)

[ Parent | on HN ]