News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by matheusmoreira on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @01:13AM (#36223109)
Not at all. It tells you someone didn't like your post. Don't think it's possible to infer anything other than that. Many times I've had posts oscillate between negative and positive scores. It's very likely there are people who agree out there.
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by Semaphor on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @02:07AM (#36223419)
When certain comments get consistently downvoted, that’s not someone not liking your post.
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by redsky880 on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @02:24PM (#36231132)
What law of physics or probability prevents a comment from consistently getting downvoted due to a disagreement in opinion?
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by Semaphor on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @02:46PM (#36231541)
None, but downvoting because of a disagreement makes you an asshole, so that still tells you stuff about the community, or at least those active in certain threads.
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by matheusmoreira on Thursday June 08, 2023 @03:20PM (#36247228)
There is no consistency. I have a comment at -2 right now. Over the past few days it oscillated between positive and negative scores. Someone replied to it and my response is currently +6.
Re:SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets ... by southernplaces7 on Thursday June 08, 2023 @07:35PM (#36250878)
In those cases its multiple people consistently disliking your posts. This doesn't necessarily make their downvotes any more valid or intelligent, or the post not worth seeing.