Our right to challenge junk patents is under threat

Re:Our right to challenge junk patents is under threat by yebyen on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @06:38PM (#36220070)

If you want to go ahead and remove again the specific context of my question/assertion after I re-added them back together, to emphasize how important that context was, go ahead and do it.

I put it back there because that was the context that I felt was most important, and you just cut it right back out again. You're not arguing in good faith at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our right to challenge junk patents is under threat by AlbertCory on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @07:28PM (#36220545)

all you had to say originally was:

"...because it's an argument in bad faith? I too don't see why drug patents are "obvious" or clear case that it is helpful enough to be in the public interest to maintain drug patents. Is there any evidence that ALL drug patents actually enter the public domain productively at their end of their expiration period?" [note the ALL]

Since you refuse to just admit you were wrong, we are done here. Go ahead and have the last word if that's important to you. I won't be replying any more.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our right to challenge junk patents is under threat by yebyen on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @08:12PM (#36220952)

LOL you're right, we could have had a civil conversation and productive dialog if I had just included that one word in my first post! My bad.

[ Parent | on HN ]