Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by personjerry on Monday June 05, 2023 @12:01AM
(#36192087)
No way that's real right? That's more than junior engineers at FAANG
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by woodruffw on Monday June 05, 2023 @12:16AM
(#36192191)
Most engineers at FAANGs cost significantly more than 200K in net employer costs, which is what that number actually represents. As noted elsewhere in the thread, the actual take-home for these municipal workers is $71K, pre-tax.
Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by grantism on Monday June 05, 2023 @12:04AM
(#36192105)
Do junior FAANG engineers have to pick up human waste? IMO, "dirty work" deserves the paycheck.
Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by radicaldreamer on Monday June 05, 2023 @12:07AM
(#36192136)
Are these real jobs? Where are they operating and has anyone verified their effectiveness? In the last decade, I haven’t seen the poop problem get any better in the Mission, SoMA, and the Tenderloin…
Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by chimeracoder on Monday June 05, 2023 @12:22AM
(#36192236)
> Are these real jobs? Where are they operating and has anyone verified their effectiveness? In the last decade, I haven’t seen the poop problem get any better in the Mission, SoMA, and the Tenderloin…
It's interesting to note which jobs get this treatment ("is X doing its job? The problem X supposedly solves isn't getting any better) and which jobs get the opposite treatment ("X is clearly necessary, because without them the problem X solves would be even worse).
Re:San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260B in Value
by radicaldreamer on Monday June 05, 2023 @01:40AM
(#36192769)
I’d say the same thing about the billion+ a year the city spends on homeless “programs”