Re:OpenAI is getting sued for being biased with Y Combinator
by hn_throwaway_99 on Sunday June 04, 2023 @04:39PM
(#36189369)
OK, after I managed to get through the tweet, my only conclusion is that this guy is some sort of conspiratorial nut job.
I think this not because of the pros/cons of his actual argument. I think this because his tweet is so rambling I can't really even figure out what his argument is.
First, he never gives a clear summary of what his actual suit is about. For example, I am actually very interested in how OpenAI could start as a non-profit and then somehow "pivot" to be a for-profit enterprise - I just don't understand the details of this. But this tweet just bloviates about how all these boards and people are connected (wholly unsurprising) without making any clear argument about what actual laws have been broken - just some random appeals to "breach of fiduciary duty".
I half expected the post to end with a wide eyed picture of him saying "Illuminati!!!".
BTW, why didn't he just start with a link to the actual lawsuit! I always think it's weird when people post tweets expecting you to have full context on something they themselves just did.
I think this not because of the pros/cons of his actual argument. I think this because his tweet is so rambling I can't really even figure out what his argument is.
First, he never gives a clear summary of what his actual suit is about. For example, I am actually very interested in how OpenAI could start as a non-profit and then somehow "pivot" to be a for-profit enterprise - I just don't understand the details of this. But this tweet just bloviates about how all these boards and people are connected (wholly unsurprising) without making any clear argument about what actual laws have been broken - just some random appeals to "breach of fiduciary duty".
I half expected the post to end with a wide eyed picture of him saying "Illuminati!!!".
BTW, why didn't he just start with a link to the actual lawsuit! I always think it's weird when people post tweets expecting you to have full context on something they themselves just did.