News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Rarbg on IPFS by remram on Sunday June 04, 2023 @01:10PM (#36187329)
IPFS is distributed but not anonymized, so you can send abuse requests to people's ISPs to take content down (like with torrents).

The HTTP part is also not censorship-resistant. ipfs.io has a DMCA process, and they could also be asked to reveal the IP of users.

Re:Show HN: Rarbg on IPFS by activiation on Sunday June 04, 2023 @04:03PM (#36189045)
Use Tor?
Re:Show HN: Rarbg on IPFS by tylersmith on Sunday June 04, 2023 @06:41PM (#36190242)
IPFS can be accessed through Tor immediately through a gateway, and with a little work through the ipfs client directly.
Re:Show HN: Rarbg on IPFS by remram on Monday June 05, 2023 @02:51PM (#36201225)
Tor+IPFS is much more resistant yes.
Re:Show HN: Rarbg on IPFS by bscphil on Sunday June 04, 2023 @07:56PM (#36190711)
> you can send abuse requests to people's ISPs

In practice it's very rare for me to see a direct ipfs protocol link, almost all the traffic goes through HTTP gateways (which frequently cache the content as well). Hard to imagine that they don't become a target for "hosting" pirated content if / when IPFS becomes more than a negligible platform for piracy. (A significant amount of Library Genesis traffic is already using IPFS via these same gateways.)

As you mention, there's a DMCA process for some of the gateways, but that might not be enough to ward off attention.