News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Private Repos Considered Private-­Ish by ckdarby on Sunday June 04, 2023 @09:13AM (#36185348)
From my perspective, the upkeep of maintaining such versions is far from trivial. It involves dedicated resources ensuring the regularity and reliability of backups. Furthermore, it's rare to find organizations conducting comprehensive disaster recovery (DR) restorations of their self-hosted GitLab or GitHub instances. This is typically due to an inherent expectation that each upgrade will proceed without hitches and yield flawless operation.

Moreover, the process of securing approval for NAT inbound rules, particularly for integrations with services like Jira, Slack and so on, often turns into a labyrinthine ordeal. It usually involves navigating the differing viewpoints and interpretations across multiple departments, each with its own unique stance, which further exacerbates the complexity of the task.

Re:GitHub Private Repos Considered Private-­Ish by yetanotherloss on Sunday June 04, 2023 @11:00AM (#36186107)
As an aside, it remains funny to me how much effort organizations put into fighting NAT in 2023 instead of effort to just use ipv6.

Of course then there is the embarrassment of azure ipv6 so it's perhaps somewhat forgivable:)

Re:GitHub Private Repos Considered Private-­Ish by awesometech on Sunday June 04, 2023 @11:04AM (#36186157)
There are many valid reasons to not use IPv6, it would make an interesting HN article.
Re:GitHub Private Repos Considered Private-­Ish by Fogest on Sunday June 04, 2023 @01:33PM (#36187555)
My ISP still doesn't even support ipv6. From my limited understanding that itself would already make it a problem to access an ipv6 only site.