Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by paulpauper on Saturday June 03, 2023 @09:57PM
(#36182320)
Yet again, we see that just because you can be your bank , doesn't mean you should. These 'safe', ' audited' programs, protocols, wallets keep failing. The introduction of irrevocable bounties creates a huge incentive to find bugs. The so-called self-funded bug bounty. Never trust a 3rd party to do your crypto.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by chrsig on Saturday June 03, 2023 @10:26PM
(#36182472)
> Never trust a 3rd party to do your crypto.
This strikes me as funny because software engineers are regularly told not to roll their own crypto.
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by Vanit on Saturday June 03, 2023 @10:28PM
(#36182484)
I'm pretty sure these are different uses of the word crypto.
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by ipython on Saturday June 03, 2023 @11:12PM
(#36182730)
I chuckled because I interpreted their comment as a pun
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by wolongong942 on Saturday June 03, 2023 @11:52PM
(#36182938)
The CEO is a huge scammer and at least one audit said atomic wallet was very insecure.
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by rkagerer on Sunday June 04, 2023 @12:33AM
(#36183126)
Not doubting you but could we get sources for that? (Genuinely interested in some of the key highlights from that audit)
Re:Atomic Wallet exploited, users report loss of entire port...
by not_your_vase on Sunday June 04, 2023 @12:49AM
(#36183190)
Well, being audited means only that it is audited. Nobody forces the company/developers to act upon the findings of the audit... but still, technically it is true that they were audited even if the outcome of the audit was "haha, I wouldn't trust my used hanky on this"