> > "Personalized training is so much better, that you wouldn't have to spend so much time doing school or homework or whatever."

> "Sorry - but fantastic claims need fantastic amounts of supporting evidence. It seems that all you have is a hunch that it ought to be so."

I'm talking about something specific it's the 'two sigma problem' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_2_sigma_problem) "the average student tutored one-to-one using mastery learning techniques performed two standard deviations better than students educated in a classroom environment with one teacher to 30 students, with or without mastery learning"

> "Not only is it trivial to see that this does not preclude them from cheating"

If you mean cheating by using advanced AI, I'm not sure what you're talking about. They won't have any devices. You are suggesting they have brain implants or they are smuggling some devices?

> "forcing these poor kids to do all their work through bots (and in isolation from other students) is just ... too nauseating to contemplate."

They only need to spend a fraction of the day doing the personalized 'book learning'. The rest of the time they can spend time playing with their friends. That could even be part of their 'school day'. Just to have fun.