Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by travisjungroth on Friday June 02, 2023 @06:11PM
(#36171468)
I think it’s harder for people to see it that way when there’s means testing. Also when you’re at the just-better-than free tier, but paying full price.
I think that’s the nice thing about UBI. It’s a little different to rail against u employed people getting $1,000 a month when you’re also getting $1,000 a month.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by mjevans on Friday June 02, 2023 @06:24PM
(#36171602)
UBI won't answer the problem of RENT. The rent will always rise to pickup the new headroom until there is no longer headroom. All the profit will go to the rent seekers who leave nothing for anyone to get ahead.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by Clubber on Friday June 02, 2023 @09:25PM
(#36172797)
With UBI though, you can move to a much cheaper location and live there.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by erik_seaberg on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:05PM
(#36172998)
There seems to be a lot of housing going unused in declining job markets, and I hope UBI makes it feasible for people to use it more.
There's a different way to look at it as well. I don't so much pay for housing as I pay for my choice of housing. If I couldn't afford housing I'd just get whatever was deemed enough for me, the system would essentially make the choice. What i pay for is the privilege of choosing something that I want, instead of what's convenient for the system.