Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by throwaway049 on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:28PM
(#36170315)
The two things are fairly tightly connected. If ordinary citizens can't buy house, how does some other citizen (not corporation) buy one and offer it for rent to you?
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by JohnFen on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:39PM
(#36170478)
Yes, absolutely true. I wasn't really saying that not being able to buy a house is a good thing, but I did speak before thinking here.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by dragonwriter on Friday June 02, 2023 @05:16PM
(#36170851)
There are things besides individual citizens and corporations that could, in theory, own and rent housing.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by ajmurmann on Friday June 02, 2023 @05:52PM
(#36171266)
There are a lot of individuals who buy investment properties. I have friends who use this as their primary retirement vehicle and own a bunch of rental properties. They are just successful small-business owners and the properties are their private property, unrelated to the business. From last time I saw statistics on this, most rental units were still owned by small landlords.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by throwaway049 on Sunday June 04, 2023 @02:14PM
(#36187959)
Yes quite. But we were contemplating a future where small scale landlords were extinct.
But only being able to rent from large corporations? That's nightmare fuel right there.