Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by guardiangod on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:09PM
(#36170109)
So they moved to Vancouver, had a home for a year, then become homeless. The news article did not claim that the homeless respondents were homeless before they moved; simply that they are not local to Vancouver.
If you become homeless after 6 months of moving, you weren't financially stable to begin with.
EDIT: It's a moot point anymore. The fact is, they are in Vancouver and are homeless. We should help them regardless of where they came from.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by fzeroracer on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:33PM
(#36173156)
> If you become homeless after 6 months of moving, you weren't financially stable to begin with.
This might shock you, but the majority of people right now are not financially stable.
Re:California Spent $17B on Homelessness. It’s Not Working
by nonethewiser on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:47PM
(#36173237)
> So they moved to Vancouver, had a home for a year, then become homeless
Where are you getting this from?
If you scroll down slightly (3.11) you'll see 81% of respondents had a home in Vancouver before they became homeless, which is the data to match the claim ("overwhelmingly people who had stable living situations in those comfortable locations, and became homeless there").
[1] https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/vancouver-homeless-count-2019...