News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It’s Not Wrong that “ ”.length == 7 by L3viathan on Friday June 02, 2023 @03:51AM (#36162339)
It is useful: When iterating over a string in Python (which I hope you agree _is_ useful?), you get that many parts.
Re:It’s Not Wrong that “ ”.length == 7 by masklinn on Friday June 02, 2023 @03:55AM (#36162377)
> It is useful: When iterating over a string in Python (which I hope you agree _is_ useful?), you get that many parts.

That’s… not useful?

I can’t say I remember ever caring knowing how many items I would be getting during an iteration[0]. If I want to set an iteration limit I can just… do that, using `islice` or some such.

[0] in python anyway, in lower level language there can be a utility in order to pre-allocate an output collection

Re:It’s Not Wrong that “ ”.length == 7 by chrismorgan on Friday June 02, 2023 @04:03AM (#36162423)
> When iterating over a string in Python (which I hope you agree _is_ useful?)

Not often. There’s almost nothing useful you can correctly do with a sequence of code points.