News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly. Parent comment

Re:You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly by dbgev on Friday June 02, 2023 @12:27AM (#36161059)
It doesn't need to stop the determined users, thete's value in just filtering out articles that are not even proofread by humans.

It's going to be a constant cat and mouse game, I agree, but for now it just need to catch the dead mice.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly by alvah on Friday June 02, 2023 @12:35AM (#36161102)
The phrase "As an AI language model" could be useful here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly by dbgev on Friday June 02, 2023 @12:40AM (#36161128)
Is accusing people of being an AI model going to become the new Godwin's law?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly by gpderetta on Friday June 02, 2023 @02:55AM (#36161937)
Accusing people of being chat bots has a long tradition on the internet.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:You can watermark GPT's outputs discreetly by JohnFen on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:52AM (#36165914)
Yes, but before, it was pretty easy to tell if the accusation is supportable or not. With LLMs, it won't be, so the accusation carries more weight.
[ Parent | on HN ]