News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI Employee: GPT-4 hasn't gotten worse since March by TeMPOraL on Thursday June 01, 2023 @09:13PM (#36159601)
> Collective confusion in the thread suggests something has changed, but the most OpenAI will attest to is that the API is unchanged and the models are static. And this may well be true

Here's the thing. Re-read the exchange you quoted:

>> The API does not just change without us telling you. The models are static there.

>> This is good to know. That means GPT-4 has been static since March right? 0314?

>> Correct

Does that "Correct" mean all GPT-4 models have been static since March, or does it only cover the gpt-4-0314, which is a single, specific model? gpt-4-0314 is the static snapshot model, hence 0314 in the name; it exist as a stable base, while gpt-4 was intended to be updated over time.

So I feel OpenAI may be dodging here. That "Correct" may just mean "the gpt-4-0314 model was not updated since March 14", which is, like, the very reason this model exists in the first place.

Important point: if you're using API pay-as-you-go access, unless you wrote the very tools you use with that API, you're most likely using gpt-4, and not gpt-4-0314.

Re:OpenAI Employee: GPT-4 hasn't gotten worse since March by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Thursday June 01, 2023 @10:45PM (#36160238)
> if you're using API pay-as-you-go access, unless you wrote the very tools you use with that API, you're most likely using gpt-4, and not gpt-4-0314.

Do you know of any alternative ChatGPT UIs like chatbotui.com or typingmind.com that let you specify the model gpt-4-0314 ?

This feature alone would be enough for me to switch.