News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by RandomBK on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:19AM (#36147820)
This of course, only works for your own internal use. I feel this disclaimer needs to be called out explicitly.

If you're trying to do something that will be trusted by the global internet, you'll need to use an official CA, ergo the complaints of DNSSEC being too 'centralized'.

Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by IcePic on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:30AM (#36147874)
Then again, what the "global CAs" are doing is not wholly different in a technical level than what a company with their own internal CA does, except that I hope the global CAs take security very very seriously, and they pass an expensive audit.

In the end, it is just some company or organisation that creates a root CA cert and intermediaries, and then jump through hoops to make browsers and OS cert stores add their certs. Not saying it is easy, just that the technical parts are rather similar, the rest being a cumbersome way to prove you are trustworthy by showing off your processes and fences around the signing boxes.

Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by RandomBK on Thursday June 01, 2023 @01:47AM (#36147936)
In the case of DNSSEC, the ultimate 'root key' is handled quite carefully and is interesting to read up on.

https://www.iana.org/dnssec/files

https://www.cloudflare.com/dns/dnssec/root-signing-ceremony/

Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by detourdog on Thursday June 01, 2023 @05:36AM (#36149055)
One can distribute self signed ssl certificates. Not using a CA is more secure for the group relying on the certificates to maintain encryption.