Re:Japan Goes All In: Copyright Doesn’t Apply to AI Training
by fnordpiglet on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @08:31PM
(#36146306)
Except these models are not designed to circumvent copyright, in fact their primary purpose is to generate non-copyright and non-copyrightable output. It can be induced to product facsimiles of copyright material, but that’s explicitly not the purpose or intent and requires positive action on the users behalf to occur.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Japan Goes All In: Copyright Doesn’t Apply to AI Training
by kmod on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @09:18PM
(#36146584)
I'm saying `A => B` (something should be illegal if it's primarily for crime) and you're saying `-A` (LLMs are not primarily for crime), which is not really a disagreement. My point is disagreeing with the GGP who argued that `-B regardless of A` (LLMs should not be a crime regardless of whether they facilitate crime, because it is the end-user who is committing the crime).
I happen to mostly believe the conclusion (`-B`) but not the particular argument.