Re:What's the best AWS S3 protocol alternative?
by bravetraveler on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @01:20PM
(#36140924)
I hadn't considered it! Your username is appropriate, too much to do :D
My requirements are pretty low so I was likely to just let it slide...
...but with your help (and perhaps from others on understanding the pieces), I'll consider it!
I'm remarkably unfamiliar with S3 style of services, only occasionally trying to dabble
edit: The choosing of appropriate headers may come down to Mattermost/clients -- BackBlaze might be technically doing the right thing saying "I don't know what to do with these"
Re:What's the best AWS S3 protocol alternative?
by toomuchtodo on Thursday June 08, 2023 @08:36PM
(#36251473)
What can I say, I want to solve all the things :) I will report back.
Re:What's the best AWS S3 protocol alternative?
by kpetermeni on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @02:37PM
(#36142095)
+1
Please do. Backblaze lists x-amz-sdk-checksum-algorithm as unsupported [1]. Would be great to have it supported to be able to use it with Mattermost and other tools that use min.io for S3.
[1] https://www.backblaze.com/b2/docs/s3_compatible_api.html
> When you're using an SDK, you can set the value of the x-amz-sdk-checksum-algorithm parameter to the algorithm that you want Amazon S3 to use when calculating the checksum. Amazon S3 automatically calculates the checksum value.
> When you're using the REST API, you don't use the x-amz-sdk-checksum-algorithm parameter. Instead, you use one of the algorithm-specific headers (for example, x-amz-checksum-crc32).
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/checki...