Re:Ask HN: Is it just me or GPT-4's quality has significantl...
by circuit10 on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @11:07AM
(#36139229)
There is a lot of randomness involved, are you sure it wasn’t just chance? If you try again it might work
Re:Ask HN: Is it just me or GPT-4's quality has significantl...
by kayge on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @01:52PM
(#36141357)
So I thought I was getting great book summaries (from GPT 3.5, I guess) for various business books I had seen recommended, but then out of curiosity one day I asked it questions about a fiction book that I've re-read multiple times (Daemon by Daniel Suarez)... and well now I can say that I've seen AI Hallucinations firsthand:
https://chat.openai.com/share/d1cdd811-edc9-4d55-9cc1-a79215...
Not a very scientific or conclusive test to be sure, but I think I'll stick with using ChatGPT as my programming-rubber-ducky-on-steroids for now :)
Re:Ask HN: Is it just me or GPT-4's quality has significantl...
by pk-protect-ai on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @03:31PM
(#36142979)
Can't post this link enough: https://www.openpetition.eu/petition/online/securing-our-dig...
For now there is no other way to train models than the huge infrastructure. CERN have a tendency to provide results for the money spend and they have experience in building the infrastructures for sure.
I saw the nerfing of GPT in real time: one day it was giving me great book summaries, the next one it said that it couldn't do it due to copyright.
I actually called it in a comment several months ago: copyright and other forms of control would make GPT dumb in the long run. We need an open source frontier less version.