Re:Rust: The wrong people are resigning
by coldtea on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @05:47AM
(#36136429)
>What reasons are there to announce that one knows who should've resigned, in an announcement that refuses to identify them? Is it legal? Fear of retribution? Some internal Rust community process? Something I'm missing that the authors of these farewell letters assume everyone who follows Rust already knows?
That it's not meant to point fingers to particular individuals ("X is bad, and should regign but hasn't") or serve as news coverage, but just describe the sittuation ("bad actors are still here")?
>Why be transparent over the lack of transparency but keep the problem intentionally and loudly opaque, rather than going the other way around and whistleblowing?
That it's not meant to point fingers to particular individuals ("X is bad, and should regign but hasn't") or serve as news coverage, but just describe the sittuation ("bad actors are still here")?
>Why be transparent over the lack of transparency but keep the problem intentionally and loudly opaque, rather than going the other way around and whistleblowing?
Tact?