Statement on AI Risk

Re:Statement on AI Risk by chefandy on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @05:07PM (#36130817)

I'm not really interested in doing a research project on the signatories to investigate your claim, and talking about things like this without specifics seems dubiously useful, so I don't really think there's anything more to discuss.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on AI Risk by haldujai on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @05:14PM (#36130915)

Huh, you don’t have to do any research.

Go to: https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk#signatories and uncheck notable figures.

Several of the names at the top list a corporate affiliation.

If you want me to pick specific ones with obvious conflicts (chosen at a glance): Geoffrey Hinton, Ilya Sutskever, Ian Goodfellow, Shane Legg, Samuel Bowman and Roger Grosse are representative examples based on self-disclosed affiliations (no research required).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on AI Risk by chefandy on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @05:39PM (#36131258)

Oh so you're saying the ones there with conflicts listed. That's only like 1/3 of the list.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Statement on AI Risk by haldujai on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @05:43PM (#36131320)

Yes, as I said “many” have obvious conflicts from listed affiliations so it would be nice to have a positive/negative disclosure from the rest.

[ Parent | on HN ]