Re:Statement on AI Risk
by RandomLensman on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @01:06PM
(#36127430)
Who on the list is an expert on existential risk (and perhaps even beyond academia)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Most people that study AI existential risk specifically are studying it due to concerns about AI x-risk. So the list of relevant AI x-risk experts will be subject to massive selection effects.
If instead you want to consider the highest status/most famous people working on AI in general, then the list of signatories here is a pretty good summary. From my flawed perspective as a casual AI enthusiast, Yann LeCun and Jürgen Schmidhuber are the most glaring omissions (and both have publicly stated their lack of concern about AI x-risk).
Of course, the highest status people aren't necessarily the most relevant people. Unfortunately, it's more difficult for me to judge relevance than fame.
Re:Statement on AI Risk
by holmesworcester on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @01:19PM
(#36127586)
Signatory Jan Taallin has founded an x-risk organization focused on AI, biotech, nuclear weapons, and climate change:
Who in the world is an expert on existential risk? It's kind of hard to have empirically tested knowledge about that sort of thing.
Re:Statement on AI Risk
by RandomLensman on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @02:36PM
(#36128705)
Pretty sure there are people looking into nuclear deterrence, bioterrorism defense, planetary defense etc. (We didn't have a nuclear war or some bioweapon killing everyone, for example, despite warnings).
There are people studying how previous societies got into existential risk situations, too.
We also have a huge amount of socio-economic modelling going into climate change, for example.
So I'd say there should be quite a few around.