Re:Group accused in $225K 'dice sliding' cheating scheme at ...
by kelnos on Tuesday May 30, 2023 @03:02AM
(#36121924)
> They're agreeing to the rules of the game.
I know I've been arguing the opposite in other comments, but in this case they apparently didn't actually agree to the rules of the game, and yet they chose to play anyway: the rules do state that sliding isn't allowed, and that the dice have to tumble in a certain way for it to be considered a valid roll.
Regardless, though, I think it's the casino's responsibility to ensure rules like that are followed, and if they fail to do so (due to cost-cutting measures like having software run a craps table), that's on them.
I know I've been arguing the opposite in other comments, but in this case they apparently didn't actually agree to the rules of the game, and yet they chose to play anyway: the rules do state that sliding isn't allowed, and that the dice have to tumble in a certain way for it to be considered a valid roll.
Regardless, though, I think it's the casino's responsibility to ensure rules like that are followed, and if they fail to do so (due to cost-cutting measures like having software run a craps table), that's on them.