Re:The Gemini protocol as seen by curl maintainer
by stepupmakeup on Sunday May 28, 2023 @06:17PM
(#36108316)
does anybody actually use Gemini exclusively, or is it just like Gopher where everybody ends up hosting a HTTP proxy anyway?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Gemini protocol as seen by curl maintainer
by tolciho on Sunday May 28, 2023 @06:52PM
(#36108563)
No, but browsing the web with w3m isn't much different than browsing gemini with amfora. And with xterm*colorMode:false set, of course. The web can be a lot worse than gemini, but that's the modern web for you.
(Yes, I know your http log says that this browser is "User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 8.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; MS-RTC LM 8)"; it is not. It is rather amusing to see what sites break because of this.)
Re:The Gemini protocol as seen by curl maintainer
by tpoacher on Sunday May 28, 2023 @08:23PM
(#36109187)
Not sure what you mean exclusively. It's not meant to replace the web.
But I often browse Gemini pages, and many people have capsules that don't have web mirrors.
Re:The Gemini protocol as seen by curl maintainer
by halicarnassus on Monday May 29, 2023 @02:15AM
(#36111224)
I use Gemini with Lagrange, a Gemini GUI browser, as often as I use a normal web browser or RSS reader to read content. But I enjoy it much more. I'm a less-is-more-person, so it's a good fit for me.