If so where is the transparency and accountability?
Who was the individual? Why did they do what they did?
If they do not represent project leadership, what will be done to fix this situation and prevent similar problems in the future?
If they do represent project leadership, why weren't the changes and the reasons for the changes communicated better?
A group of people mysteriously calling the shots in a closed room ultimately alienates the community and will stifle the long-term success of Rust.
The accountability must happen and shouldn't be ignored, and I hope that various parties step forward to handle the mea culpa responsibly, but it's a bit early to grab the pitchforks, light the torches and march to the town square.
Fair enough.
How the situation is handled matters, so I suppose we will see.
>> Come on, Rust committee. Let's grow up here, shall we?
It is too much power held by one group with too little accountability.
More transparency is needed and more people from different organizations need to be involved.
The fact that JT and the rest of us have to guess what really happened speaks volumes.