Re:Unnatural Keys – Nature doesn’t come with identifiers
by rini17 on Sunday May 28, 2023 @04:08AM
(#36102106)
Most of the time you don't interact directly with elements, but with molecules. Oh, and ions. And radicals. And and....
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unnatural Keys – Nature doesn’t come with identifiers
by TeMPOraL on Sunday May 28, 2023 @04:11AM
(#36102128)
And isotopes. And transient, unstable configurations that may exist for a brief moment before decaying into something that slots into the periodic table better.
And also elements aren't a thing, quantum fields are. This is why you sometimes see things that just don't fit the idea of distinct atoms. But then quantum fields also aren't a thing. We don't know what exactly is the thing. We only have increasingly sophisticated working models.
Re:Unnatural Keys – Nature doesn’t come with identifiers
by rini17 on Sunday May 28, 2023 @04:25AM
(#36102180)
No need to go to such philosophical depths. We're only poor engineers trying to come up with workable model. The periodical table of elements was a true boon and it is unlikely these "foreign keys" will change, but still - it alone isn't fully suitable as data model for chemistry.