News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TV doctors say annual checkups save lives. Real doctors c... by andreareina on Sunday May 28, 2023 @12:43AM (#36101195)
Your test is consistent with condition A. Its prevalence in the general population is B/1000 people. We can do a follow-up test that involves B, C, D, will cost $E and in cases like yours confirm condition A in F% of cases. Or we can wait and see; we'll redo the test in G time out if you present with other signs and symptoms H, I, J. Other possible causes for the test result are K, L, M. How could you like to proceed?
Re:TV doctors say annual checkups save lives. Real doctors c... by mattkrause on Sunday May 28, 2023 @08:43AM (#36103513)
I have a PhD in this stuff and I'm not sure I'd want to be making those sorts of decisions, especially for myself or a loved one.

In your example, suppose I do have A (or K, L, or M). If I wait, how will that affect the costs and prognosis? Or if I go ahead with the test, what are the possible side effects (e.g., for a biopsy) and what would managing them cost? Even if you're confident that you have—and understand—all the relevant information, you're also often making these decisions in an emotionally-charged situation.