Re:Oracle v. Google: "the value of this case keeps getting s...
by philiphodgen on Sunday February 19, 2012 @12:58PM
(#3609846)
There are two reasons the value of the case gets smaller and smaller.
One is that the large assigned value at the beginning was a lie. When truth appears lies evaporate. (Usually).
The other is that Google's lawyers did their extremely difficult job--using their technical smiles they have methodically pruned an overgrown oak into a bonsai.
Look at both sides of the equation. What was paid? What is the value of what was bought?
One is that the large assigned value at the beginning was a lie. When truth appears lies evaporate. (Usually).
The other is that Google's lawyers did their extremely difficult job--using their technical smiles they have methodically pruned an overgrown oak into a bonsai.
Look at both sides of the equation. What was paid? What is the value of what was bought?