Re:AI tools like ChatGPT are built on mass copyright infring...
by 1827163 on Friday May 26, 2023 @05:15PM
(#36089601)
Yes, I have a similar attitude myself, to ignore copyright law for personal non-commercial usage. But if I want to do anything commercial, then I've got to respect it. That's my compromise stance on it.
Re:AI tools like ChatGPT are built on mass copyright infring...
by feikname on Friday May 26, 2023 @05:49PM
(#36089908)
> If you publish something, you should be prepared for others to reproduce it and take it without credit.
> the net cost of copying data is effectively nothing.
Since the cost of including the author and the link to original work is so cheap I dont see why not have the courtesy of adding that info. They're are already doing the work for free, recognition is the least you could pay in respect for it.
Granted, sometimes things are a complex tree of authorship transformations and it's an interesting question of how far back you d go for that but sometimes its pretty cut and dry too.
I'll entertain arguments from either side of the infringement debate, but this opinion piece reads more like a reactionary defense of copyright rather than a measured response. These damages are... not that significant. It feels like Big Tech swooping in to defend Open Source not because they care about freedom, but because without it they would have no software. But instead of copyleft, it's copyright. Hmm.